TL;DR
BTS will not submit any material for the 69th Grammy Awards, marking the first time the group has voluntarily skipped a Grammy cycle since their 2020 nomination. The decision, announced July 29, 2026, shifts the K-pop landscape ahead of the 2027 ceremony and raises questions about the Recording Academy’s ability to retain the world’s biggest pop act.
What Happened
On Wednesday, July 29, 2026, BTS declared through its official channels that it will forgo submission for the 69th Grammy Awards, skipping what would have been its eighth consecutive Grammy eligibility period. The announcement, first reported by Variety, confirms that the seven-member group will not compete for any category at the 2027 ceremony, a move that catches the music industry off guard as the group had only recently resumed full-group activities after completing mandatory military service.
Key Facts
- The 69th Grammy Awards are scheduled for early 2027, with the eligibility period ending August 31, 2026 — BTS’s decision means no new group music will be submitted before that deadline.
- BTS has received six Grammy nominations to date: Best Pop Duo/Group Performance for “Dynamite” (2021) and “Butter” (2022), Best Music Video for “Dynamite” (2021) and “Yet to Come” (2023), and Best Pop Vocal Album for Love Yourself: Answer (2019) and BE (2021). They have never won.
- The group’s last Grammy appearance was the 65th ceremony in 2023, where they performed “Yet to Come” but lost all three of its nominations that year.
- All seven members completed South Korea’s mandatory military service between December 2022 and June 2025, with the final member, Jungkook, discharged on June 11, 2025.
- Since reuniting in mid-2025, BTS released a single “The Stars Align” in November 2025 — its first group track in over two years — and announced a world tour for 2026–2027, which is still ongoing.
- The decision applies only to group submissions; individual members remain free to submit solo projects, though no member has announced a solo Grammy bid for the 69th cycle.
- Variety’s report cites “a desire to reimagine their creative path” as the stated reason, but does not include direct quotes from BTS or its management, HYBE.
Breaking It Down
The most remarkable aspect of BTS’s Grammy boycott is the timing. The group is in the middle of a world tour that has already grossed over $350 million across 32 dates, according to Billboard Boxscore estimates. Walking away from the industry’s most visible awards platform while touring at peak capacity suggests a calculated repositioning, not a reaction to fatigue.
The last time a group with BTS’s global commercial dominance — selling 6.2 million album-equivalent units in 2025 alone, per IFPI — voluntarily sat out a Grammy cycle was the Beatles’ post-1970 hiatus. No act of comparable scale has ever declined to participate while still actively releasing music and touring.
The decision carries echoes of the Recording Academy’s long struggle to integrate non-English-language pop success. BTS’s Korean-language tracks have never won a Grammy, while their English singles “Dynamite” and “Butter” — both nominated — also lost. The Academy’s voting body, which remains overwhelmingly American and English-speaking, has awarded Best Pop Duo/Group Performance to acts like Doja Cat & SZA (2022, “Kiss Me More”) and Sam Smith & Kim Petras (2023, “Unholy”) while bypassing BTS in consecutive years. By skipping the 69th ceremony, BTS forces a reckoning: is the Grammys’ definition of “pop excellence” inclusive of a seven-member Korean group that has topped the Billboard Hot 100 six times?
From a strategic standpoint, the move also protects BTS’s brand equity. Each Grammy loss — particularly the 2023 defeat in all three nominated categories — generated intense fan backlash and media scrutiny that overshadowed the group’s actual achievements. Removing themselves from that cycle allows the group to control its narrative: the “Chapter 2” era of solo projects (2022–2024) and the post-military reunion are now framed as independent artistic statements, not as bids for a prize they have been denied. HYBE, BTS’s management company, reported a 12% drop in share price on the Tokyo Stock Exchange the day after the announcement, reflecting investor concern about reduced Grammy-related exposure, but the long-term messaging is one of self-sufficiency.
What Comes Next
The immediate ripple effects will unfold in several concrete phases between now and the 69th Grammy ceremony.
-
September 2026: The Recording Academy will announce nominees for the 69th Grammys. Without BTS in the two major pop categories (Best Pop Duo/Group Performance and Best Pop Vocal Album), competition shifts — acts like Seventeen, Blackpink, or Stray Kids may emerge as the K-pop representatives, though none have BTS’s cross-over track record. Expect intense lobbying from HYBE for solo nominations for RM, Jungkook, or Jimin, each of whom has had solo Billboard Hot 100 entries.
-
October–December 2026: BTS will complete the remaining leg of its world tour (scheduled through December in Asia and Australia). The group is expected to release a new album in early 2027 — potentially after the Grammy eligibility window closes — further distancing group output from the awards cycle. Watch for an announcement of a multi-album contract with a new distribution partner, possibly Universal Music Group, as a signal of long-term Grammy disengagement.
-
January 2027: The Grammy ceremony date will be confirmed (typically late January or early February). If BTS does not attend even as presenters or performers, it will mark the first Grammy ceremony since 2020 without any BTS presence. The Academy will likely offer a performance slot to entice the group back; HYBE’s response will indicate whether the boycott is permanent or a one-cycle pause.
-
February–March 2027: Following the ceremony, the Recording Academy will release its annual diversity and inclusion report. BTS’s absence will likely be cited by advocacy groups as evidence of the Academy’s failure to recognize non-Western pop. Congress has not weighed in, but the Korean Creative Content Agency (KOCCA) may issue a statement, given BTS’s status as a cultural export worth an estimated $5 billion annually to the South Korean economy.
The Bigger Picture
BTS’s Grammy skip is not an isolated protest but the latest signal in two converging trends. K-pop’s institutional disenchantment — groups like Twice, Blackpink, and NCT 127 have all received only one or two Grammy nominations combined, despite selling millions of albums — has built toward a breaking point. The Recording Academy’s expansion of global categories and international membership in 2023 did not translate into more K-pop wins. BTS’s exit forces the Academy to confront that its 12,000 voting members still favor English-language, Western-produced music.
Simultaneously, the post-Grammy, direct-to-fan model is accelerating. Artists from Taylor Swift (who skipped the 2021 Grammys entirely) to The Weeknd (who boycotted after 2021 snubs) have demonstrated that awards-show absence does not correlate with commercial decline. BTS’s ARMY fanbase, which drove $1.2 billion in concert ticket sales and merchandise from 2022–2025, does not require Grammy validation to sustain engagement. The group’s decision may therefore inspire other top-tier global acts — especially those from non-English markets — to similarly deprioritize the Grammys, refocusing on touring, streaming, and direct artist-to-fan platforms.
Key Takeaways
- [Grammy boycott is a strategic recalibration]: BTS is not lashing out; it is repositioning its narrative away from award-show dependency after six losses, protecting its brand from further voting-bias scrutiny.
- [Timing maximizes bargaining power]: Announced during a $350-million tour, the move gives BTS leverage with the Recording Academy and with other award shows (MAMA, Billboard Music Awards) that may now fight harder for their presence.
- [K-pop representation faces a test]: Without BTS in the pop categories, the 69th Grammys will reveal whether the Academy can recognize other K-pop acts on their own terms or whether BTS was a unique, unrepeatable phenomenon from the Academy’s perspective.
- [Industry precedent for skipping]: BTS joins a small list of all-time top-selling acts (the Beatles, Drake, The Weeknd) who have voluntarily skipped Grammy cycles while at their commercial peak — signaling a shift away from the Grammys as the sole arbiter of pop success.
